Global Warming is a Crock..
Jan 28th, 2010 by Rick Arms
As the political debates heat up, the majority of the American public still feels that the Earth is heating up as well. There has been a multitude of research conducted exhibiting that the Earth is, in fact, heating up. (Many Global warming supporters just
threw their hands up in the air.) Although the Earth is getting hotter, there is nothing horribly wrong. The Earth constantly heats and cools as it is a living and breathing mass of water, dirt, and gases. Changes are to be expected. Do we, as intelligent human beings, think that a planet that was created through an event labeled the “Big Boom” is going to be an utterly and completely stable environment? Who are we to access the recent heating trend and call it abnormal? Furthermore, who decided that this heating trend was the fault of man?? Many global warming supporters claim that glaciers are melting and shrinking. Are they? Some glaciers are expanding actually, as stated in my last article regarding global warming. At this juncture, however, I will admit that some glaciers are shrinking. Glaciers in Antarctica have been shown to be shrinking. A possible explanation for this is a volcano centered under the ice sheets. Sometime around 207 B.C., this volcano erupted spewing hot lava and ash over the ice, causing large areas to melt (Chang, 2008). Little is know about this volcano. If this volcano is still active and magma is breaching the surface of the Earth’s crust, could it not heat both the ocean water and the ice layers? Under further research is done, there is not adequate answer to this question. With other glaciers growing larger, the glacial melting support used by global warming supporters is now debunked.
Another item of global warming discussion is the CO2 emissions caused by vehicles and the quest for alternative fuel methods. Again, who are we to consider the CO2 levels in the atmosphere as high? What is this claim based upon? Next, how do all
of the major global warming supporters travel? They drive their “green” electric automobiles to the airport, where they board a jet that has four engines much larger than that of an automobile engine. While they sit on the tarmac, these four massive engines spew outrageous amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. More greenhouse gases mean more global warming. That is how it works, right? I haven’t seen too many of these global warming supporters taking trains or driving their environment friendly vehicles across country. They fly.
Lastly, if CFC’s are so harmful to our ozone, why haven’t they been outlawed? I remember the cries of their being a hole in the ozone layer and how we could all burn up from the rays of the sun. Again, should we fear holes in the ozone? How do we know that holes in the ozone are not normal? In 1973, chlorine was identified as the catalytic in ozone destruction. That was 25 years ago, yet chlorine is still used in large proportions. When a thin spot was found in the ozone layer over Antarctica in 1985, it was found to be the result of atmospheric dynamics, solar radiation, and chemical reactions. The thickness of the ozone was seen to change during different seasons (CFCs and Ozone Depletion, n.d.).
So, if the ozone was seen to change and vary, yet this discovery took a very long time to discover, how are we to know that a similar trend is not true to this global warming hoax? Temperatures, glacial readings, and other conditions used to support the notion of global warming have not been recorded for a long enough period of time to make rash decisions. There is especially not enough information of the idea that our presidential candidates should be debating what to do about it. The hoax of global warming needs to be put to rest finally so that some of the lesser educated public does not run out and vote for a presidential candidate because of their views on a phantom problem.
Intresting read, something else you can consider is there is a 800 year lag between CO2 levels and global temps found in core samples, Al got this bit a bit wrong, you see CO2 levels are rising as a result of an increase in temperatures, what this means is, you will see temperatures decrease at points whilst CO2 levels continue to increase, this is quite a simple answer. Its also worth noting that there is only a mean temp increase in the last 70 years or so of 0.2 degrees. State of fear my friends, it keeps you under the thumb.
No f****** s***! What isn’t a crock is that the amount of lobotomies performed recently on commi-pinko, maggot-infested, liberal scum has incresed 10-fold in recent months. There’s room to move as a lobotomy surgeon right now.
Environmentalism is now just BIG business more concerned with wealth transfer than the environment.
I don’t believe it. I know its all part of “their” plan and every man and his dog is buying into this tripe. Just watching Myhrvol pitching his “solution”. Again, it is just part of the plan. Its fake but lots of people are making money out of it and it is … say it with me .. part of the plan. Watch and learn.
Since human beings breathe in oxygen and breathe out CO2, if the global warming folks want to make a contribution to reducing this pollutant, why don’t they stop breathing?
We may not all burn up in a 100 years time, but chucking shite into the air is going to change something. If you have the tenacity to argue with 95% of academics, then I wish you all the luck!
“For those of you that do not know, the word evidence can be replaced with the word fact.” You try to be glib here. You pretty much lost me at this point. Evidence is postulated and then deemed perhaps strong but falsifiable. A fact, on the other hand, is considered irrefutable, a naturalised, hegemony winning concept, which even within the ‘global warming is a problem camp’, would be wrong to take as biblical. You state no falsifiable evidence for your readers, but decide to state your slippery diction as fact- that just isn’t good enough. I can agree with you on only one thing, and that is that politicians and the media lack anything beyond that of a ‘moral panic’ fed by this decorum of neo-liberalism, approach, in order to win votes by telling us it is how we consume, rather than having the balls to shift past this restrictive paradigm, and change our lives for the better. You have caught on to a hoax absolutely, but you are barking up the wrong tree… We may not all burn
I’m glad that not everyone is fooled by Al Gore’s propaganda-filled movie. Great Article.
Climate change is a natural phenomena: http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=881376822
The only thing melting out there in the world are people’s intelligence.